MONITOR

The Latest Transit Ban Bars Migrants Seeking Asylum

When it comes to xenophobic policies, the Supreme Court backs Trump

Anjali Enjeti
ZORA
Published in
4 min readSep 25, 2019

--

Members of the activist group Rise And Resist gathered at a silent protest inside The Oculus on September 12, 2019
Members of the activist group Rise And Resist gathered at a silent protest inside The Oculus on September 12, 2019. Photo: Erik McGregor/LightRocket/Getty

TThe Supreme Court’s short but disastrous order in Barr v. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant temporarily allows the implementation of an “asylum ban,” also known as a “transit ban,” or “safe third country ban.” With few exceptions, the ban bars most migrants (many of whom are Central Americans) from entering the United States to seek asylum at the southern border.

At least until the lower federal courts resolve outstanding legal challenges, asylum seekers will be forced to find refuge in a country they pass through on their way to the United States. With Customs and Border Patrol encountering tens of thousands of migrants every month at the southern border, the effect of the ban will be staggering. When the policy is enforced, even unaccompanied asylum-seeking children will be turned away.

Seeking asylum is a legal right that people have and we know that the Supreme Court has been wrong before.

After the court’s order, the Trump administration was triumphant. In an interview, acting U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Mark Morgan characterized it as a “big…

--

--

ZORA
ZORA

Published in ZORA

A publication from Medium that centers the stories, poetry, essays and thoughts of women of color.

Anjali Enjeti
Anjali Enjeti

Written by Anjali Enjeti

Journalist, critic & columnist at ZORA. Essay collection SOUTHBOUND (UGA Press) & debut novel THE PARTED EARTH (Hub City Press), spring ’21. anjalienjeti.com.

Responses (2)