Inspiration vs. Cultural Appropriation

An intimate conversation between two scholars and fiction writers who’ve witnessed both

At the 1973 Academy Awards, Sacheen Littlefeather refuses the Academy Award for Best Actor on behalf of Marlon Brando who won for his role in The Godfather. Photo: Bettmann/Getty

By

Robin Kirk

and

Karla Holloway

The conversation over cultural appropriation is necessary, long in coming, and deeply fraught. By their nature artists, including writers, absorb and incorporate many things into their work. Groups and cultures do this, too. Journalist Nadra Kareem Nittle notes that Americans who grow up in diverse communities “may pick up the dialect, customs, and religious traditions of the cultural groups that surround them,” all natural, predictable, and even desirable.

Appropriation is fundamentally different. Members of a dominant culture appropriate when they take things — sacred ideas, clothing, music, lifeways — from a historically oppressed or marginalized group, separate them from their original meaning, then use them for their own benefit and often without attribution, context, or respect. The dominant culture may celebrate these elements. But the key divider is power and the theft, erasure, and silencing of the communities where these ideas and lifeways were created.

This doesn’t work the other way, with minority groups adopting elements of the dominant culture. Nicki Lisa Cole points out that, “While people of color are forced…